Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
PL | EN
Facebook Twitter Youtube

Ordo Iuris in a battle against censorship on the Internet. There will be a lawsuit against Google

Published: 19.11.2019

Adobe Stock

The lawyers of the Ordo Iuris Institute have filed a lawsuit against Google on behalf of Paweł Lisicki. The reason is that the programmes run by the journalist are described as allegedly spreading "hate speech". The TV channel wSensie.tv, where the programmes appeared, was previously blocked by the YouTube platform. This is one of many cases of censorship of Catholic and conservative content by the administration of social network portals.

 

The removal of two episodes of the 'Wierzę' programme by Paweł Lisicki and Marek Miśko took place in August this year. The programmes presented the teaching of the Church on the ideology of the LGBT movement. According to the administration of the portal, they allegedly spread "hate speech". The channel wSensie.tv was blocked, initially for three months. The possibility of publishing further content was restored after the intervention of Ordo Iuris. YouTube decision on wSensie.tv did not indicate whether it was not allowed to present the teachings of the Church on the platform altogether or whether the reason for blocking the programmes was because of their content or title.

 

The Institute's lawyers sent a pretrial summons to Google, in which they sought an apology from the authors. Due to the lack of reaction from the management of Google, an action was brought for the protection of Paweł Lisicki's personal rights which were violated by "attributing to his work certain terms that suggest its negative character".

 

"On behalf of journalist Lisicki, we demand that Google stop further infringements, namely that the owner of YouTube refrain from removing and blocking content involving the claimant. We also requested that the court oblige Google to apologise to journalist Lisicki in writing and to publish the text of the apology on one quarter of the YouTube.com homepage. - commented Tomasz Chudzinski, an advocate, from Ordo Iuris.

 

Blocking wSensie.tv and removing journalist Lisicki's materials have not been the only manifestations of censorship recently. In recent months, YouTube has suspended the TV channel wRealu24.pl, blocked the material with the homily of Archbishop Marek Jędraszewski, and limited the Facebook coverage of many Christian and conservative profiles. Ordo Iuris lawyers are analysing the submitted applications and wherever possible, they take legal action in matters related to ideological censorship.

 

Advocates Tomasz Chudzinski and Jerzy Kwaśniewski are working on the case on behalf of Ordo Iuris.

Institute Activity

24.04.2024

Conservatives aka Russia. How a Polish left-wing activist spins conspiracy theories.

Mysterious links, the Kremlin, Catholic fundamentalism – Polish pro-abortion activist Klementyna Suchanow continues her crusade against her country’s main pro-family, anti-abortion lawyers’ organization, the Ordo Iuris Institute.

 

Read more
Civil liberties

19.04.2024

How to make up connections that will transform you into a Russian agent: narratives for destroying the Right

Although Russia exerts real and dangerous influence in the West, the traditional conservative Right is nevertheless being falsely accused of pro-Moscow activities. Among the methods most commonly used are:

Read more
Civil liberties

19.04.2024

Censorship and restriction of the presumption of innocence under the guise of combating violence: a draft EP directive

· A draft directive on combating violence against women is being discussed in the European Parliament. 

· This draft may raise concerns due to its extremely broad definition of ‘violence’, as well as the government’s mandate to censor ‘offensive’ online content or its obligation to combat ‘harmful gender stereotypes’.

· The directive may also entail a restriction of the presumption of innocence in cases of sexual offences, by indirectly presuming a man’s guilt.

Read more
Civil liberties

22.03.2024

Anti-SLAPP directive may contribute to stifling public debate

A few weeks ago the European Parliament adopted a directive on „protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proveedings” („strategic lawsuits against public participation” - SLAPP).

Read more